Asbestos News Daily
MESOTHELIOMA LAWSUITS

 
     
  Friday, December 15th, 2017 MESOTHELIOMA LAWSUITS
 
 
 
 

ASBESTOSNEWSDAILY.COM NEWS ARCHIVES
AsbestosNewsDaily.com

HOME
MESOTHELIOMA IN THE NEWS
ASBESTOS IN THE NEWS
MESOTHELIOMA WORLD HEADLINES
ASBESTOS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD
ASBESTOS IN THE WORKPLACE
ASBESTOS FACTS AND STATISTICS
SECONDHAND EXPOSURE
MESOTHELIOMA SYMPTOMS
MESOTHELIOMA TREATMENTS
MESOTHELIOMA DIAGNOSIS
MESOTHELIOMA DOCTORS
MESOTHELIOMA SCREENING
MESOTHELIOMA STAGES
MESOTHELIOMA DRUGS
MESOTHELIOMA NUTRITION
MESOTHELIOMA RESEARCH
MESOTHELIOMA CLINICAL TRIALS
MESOTHELIOMA CANCER CENTERS
MESOTHELIOMA BOOK REVIEWS
PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA
PERICARDIAL MESOTHELIOMA
PERITONEAL MESOTHELIOMA
ASBESTOS RELATED CANCERS
ASBESTOS NAVY VETERANS
ASBESTOS CONTRACTOR FINES
ASBESTOS LEGISLATION
ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIST
ASBESTOS TRADES LIST
ASBESTOS ALERTS!
MESOTHELIOMA AWARENESS & GRANTS
MESOTHELIOMA COURT VERDICTS
MESOTHELIOMA WRONGFUL DEATH
MESOTHELIOMA LEGAL HISTORY
MESOTHELIOMA LAWYERS
ASBESTOS ODDLY ENOUGH
MESOTHELIOMA LAWSUITS
ALUMINUM PLANTS
CHEMICAL PLANTS
STEEL MILLS
OIL REFINERIES
POWER PLANTS
SHIPYARDS
ASBESTOS COMPANIES
ASBESTOS CITIES
ASBESTOS JOBSITES
ASBESTOS NAVY SHIPS
WOMEN AND MESOTHELIOMA


AsbestosNewsDaily.com

ABOUT US
CONTACT US
PRIVACY POLICY
ASBESTOS BANKRUPTCY CLAIMS
ASBESTOS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTS

MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER BY STATES
AsbestosNewsDaily.com

HOME
ALABAMA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
ALASKA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
ARIZONA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
ARKANSAS MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
CALIFORNIA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
COLORADO MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
CONNECTICUT MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
DELAWARE MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
FLORIDA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
GEORGIA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
HAWAII MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
IDAHO MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
ILLINOIS MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
INDIANA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
IOWA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
KANSAS MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
KENTUCKY MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
LOUISIANA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MAINE MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MARYLAND MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MASSACHUSETTS MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MICHIGAN MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MINNESOTA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MISSISSIPPI MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MISSOURI MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
MONTANA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NEBRASKA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NEVADA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NEW HAMPSHIRE MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NEW JERSEY MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NEW MEXICO MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NEW YORK MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NORTH CAROLINA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
NORTH DAKOTA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
OHIO MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
OKLAHOMA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
OREGON MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
PENNSYLVANIA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
RHODE ISLAND MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
SOUTH CAROLINA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
SOUTH DAKOTA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
TENNESSEE MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
TEXAS MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
UTAH MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
VERMONT MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
VIRGINIA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
WASHINGTON MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
WEST VIRGINIA MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
WISCONSIN MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER
WYOMING MESOTHELIOMA LAWYER

Asbestos Mesothelioma Resource Links
AsbestosNewsDaily.com

MESO RESEARCH FOUNDATION
AMERICAN CANCER FOUNDATION
MESOTHELIOMAASBESTOSHELPCENTER.COM
CANCER.GOV - FACTSHEET/TYPES/MESOTHELIOMA
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE - MESOTHELIOMA
CANCER.GOV - RADIATION THERAPY FORCANCER
CANCER.GOV- FACTSHEET/THERAPY/RADIATION
WIKIPEDIA: MESOTHELIOMA PAGE
EPA | INDOORAIR QUALITY | ASBESTOS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY -ASBESTOS
CALIFORNIAGEOLOGICAL SURVEY: ASBESTOS REPORTS -MAPS
ASBESTOS LEGISLATIVEHISTORY
NATIONAL CANCER SURVIVORS DAY FOUNDATION
WORLDCANCERCAMPAIGN.ORG
AMERICA’S ASBESTOS EPIDEMIC
CANCERCARE.ORG
WORLDCANCER DAY - FEBRAURY 04, 2010
NATIONALCANCER INSTITUTE
ASBESTOS DISEASE AWARENESS ORGANIZATION
EPA ASBESTOS HOME PAGE(Environmental Protection Agency)
ASBESTOS CONSTRUCTION HAZARD ALERT(Center to Protect Workers Rights)

 

ASBESTOS DAILY NEWS ADMINISTRATION
AsbestosNewsDaily.com

Report Broken Link
brokenlink@asbestosnewsdaily.com

Submit Asbestos Video
asbestosvideo@asbestosnewsdaily.com

Submit Asbestos Daily News Articles
asbestosnews@asbestosnewsdaily.com

Have a Question?
support@asbestosnewsdaily.com

Need a Lawyer?
needalawyer@asbestosnewsdaily.com

Need a Doctor?
needadoctor@asbestosnewsdaily.com

HONOR OF THE FALLEN SOLDIERS


 UGANDABUYAMBA.COM ORPHAN OUTREACH

 
 
 
 
 
ASBESTOS NEWS DAILY - MESOTHELIOMA LAWSUITS
AsbestosNewsDaily.com
 
11 Related Articles 
 

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
 
 
Mesothelioma Lawsuit – Asbestos Trades – $14 Million Mesothelioma Award

Mesothelioma Lawsuit - $14M Awarded To Construction Worker

Byjayita, Gaea News Network

May 28th, 2010

Lungs

FLORIDA (GaeaTimes.com) — AMesothelioma lawsuit filed by WilliamAubin against Union Carbide earned him $14 million.Aubin, aSarasota construction worker was awarded by aFlorida jury.

Aubin had filed complaint against the chemical manufacturer and several other defendants such as Georgia-Pacific for their failure to warn construction companies against their compound, made of asbestos.

Aubin started fighting against these companies after he was allegedlydiagnosed withPeritoneal Mesothelioma in the 1970s. Before that he used to work for his parents’ construction company, Key Biscayne.

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer. The disease is caused by exposure to asbestos and inhaling asbestos fibers. The rare form of cancer is found in the chest and lung. But unlike lung cancer development ofmesothelioma is not related to smoking.

Peritonealmesothelioma is a fatal and rare form of the disease that affects the abdominal cavity. Only 30% of Mesothelioma cancer cases are diagnosed asPeritonealmesothelioma.

Asbestos which is the root cause of the disease is mainly used in several manufacturing and construction companies. Although the most use of asbestos were banned in mid 1980s, the number ofmesothelioma deaths toll is rising each year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports.

Asbestosmesothelioma lawsuits are the longest running mass movements by the people ofU.S. Over 600,000 people have filed lawsuits against 6,000 defendants after being diagnosed withmesothelioma, asbestosis or other asbestos-related diseases.

The award forAubin was announced last week, when aMiami jury had determined that Union Carbide was chiefly responsible forAubin’s cancer. However, they didn’t refute the possibility of other defendants having shared the similar responsibility.

http://blog.taragana.com/health/2010/05/28/mesothelioma-lawsuit-14m-awarded-to-construction-worker-23573/

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Mesothelioma Lawsuit – Asbestos Exposure – $2.99 Million Mesothelioma Award

Asbestos-Laden Parts Lead to $3 Million Jury Award

April 30, 2010 (TopWireNews.com: - Law, press release)

(Mesothelioma News) - Decades after a sailor’s exposure to asbestos and a year after hedied frommesothelioma, a jury in Newport News, Virginia., held a shipyard supplier accountable, hitting the company with a $2.99 million verdict on April 13.

The company’s asbestos-laden parts, the jury said, helped cause the plaintiff’s disease and, ultimately, his death.

RobertHardick, who was 69 when he died in March 2009, was a former U.S. Navy petty officer who had been exposed to asbestos while serving at a naval shipyard and while at sea, from the 1950s to the 1970s.

Mesothelioma, a cancer of the protective lining that covers many of the body’s organs, can take decades to develop. In the vast majority of cases, it is caused by asbestos exposure. It is almost always fatal.

“His doctor talked vividly about his suffering,” said BobbyHatten, amesothelioma attorney with theNewport News firm of Patten,Wornom,Hatten &Diamondstein. “He was avery loved guy.”

Asbestos-a heat-resistant material used heavily on ships -is dangerous when airborne.Hardick, a father of four fromHopkinsville,Ky., had breathed in millions of invisible asbestos fibers at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. As ashipfitter,Hardick often took pumps and valves into a shop area, using brushes and hammers to remove asbestos sealants. In the process, asbestos particles became airborne andHardick breathed them in. Further asbestos exposure came whenHardick served aboard the cruiser USS Newport News.

Themesothelioma lawsuit was against the defendant, Illinois-based John Crane Inc., which had supplied the asbestos-laden parts to the Navy.

Crane’s liability represents half of a $5.98 million verdict returned by the jury. The remainder was apportioned to a codefendant in the case,Garlock Sealing Technologies of Palmyra, N.Y. ButGarlock had previously settled out of court for an undisclosed amount, leaving only Crane on the hook for its half.

Hardick, who became a successful businessman after leaving the Navy, is survived by his wife, Diane. In arriving at the nearly $6 million verdict, the jury awarded $2 million forHardick’s pain and suffering; $1.15 million for the loss suffered by his widow; $2.5 million for lost future income; and $327,000 in medical and funeral expenses.

This news was brought to you by themesothelioma attorneys at Cooney & Conway, a nationally recognized law firm that has brought recovery and justice to victims of asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases.

120 N LaSalle Street -Suite 3000Chicago,IL60602-2415
Toll Free: (888) 651-1850

http://www.cooneyconway.com

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Asbestos Verdict – Asbestos Trades –Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Mesothelioma Victim’s Family Receives Huge Award In Asbestos Exposure Case: $30.3 Million

By Thomas J. Lamb at AsbestosHUB.com | April 7, 2010

 

Back in June 2008, we reported on the largestasbestos verdict ever awarded inNew Jersey. The lawsuit pertained to the untimely death of Mark Buttitta, who succumbed tomesothelioma just before his 50th birthday.

 

Buttitta had been exposed to asbestos through his father, who worked at a GM warehouse as a parts picker. Buttitta also worked at the warehouse during the summers when he was a young man.

 

In our June 2008 post, we reported that Buttitta’s surviving wife and three daughters were awarded a huge $30.3 million dollar verdict.

 

The breakdown goes like this: $8 million for pain and suffering, $2 million for loss of consortium, $9,281,660 for loss of earnings, $2,030,544 for loss of services, and $3 million for loss of parental care and guidance for each of Buttitta’s three daughters.

 

Since that time, the defendants have fought hard trying to appeal and reverse this decision. Falling on several tactics to shirk their responsibility, they have argued that the judge was mistaken in each of these categories:

 

§                    causation

§                    the admission of plaintiff’s expert testimony

§                    Borg-Warner’s claims against settling defendants; and,

§                    its motion for a remittitur.

§                     

After a long and careful review, no errors were found in any of the judge’s rulings. The judgment and award for $30.3 million will stand.

 

For an excellent and detailed account of each argument for and against the defendants’ claims of judgment error, visit BUTTITTA v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. at Leagle.com.

 

http://asbestoshub.com/2010/04/07/mesothelioma-victims-family-receives-huge-award-in-asbestos-exposure-case-303-million/
 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Jury Verdict – Asbestos Exposure – $4.5 Million Asbestos Lawsuit

Verdicts & Settlements June 25, 2009: Asbestos suit brings $4.5MClayCounty jury verdict

By Angela Riley
Publication:Missouri Lawyers Media
Date: Thursday, June 25 2009

AClayCountyjury awarded $4.5 million in a family'swrongful death asbestos lawsuit.

The suit was brought by the wife and two children of aKansas City ceiling tile installer, Robert Wagner. Wagner worked for various contractors installing ceiling tiles in commercial buildings inKansas City

Wagner was a part of major commercial projects, including Hallmark'sCrownCenter and theKansas CityInternationalAirport.

Wagner was laterdiagnosed withmesothelioma, an aggressive form of lung cancer. Wagner died a year later in 2007 at age 70. Mesothelioma is known to be caused by exposure to asbestos. It was not disputed at trial that Wagner's cancer was caused by his exposure to asbestos, said defense attorney W. JamesFoland, ofFoland,Wickens,Eisfelder, Roper and Hofer in Kansas City.

Because Wagner worked around and used so many materials that contained asbestos, the plaintiffs relied on extensive witness testimony from Wagner's colleagues concerning which materials were used in the sites where he worked. Some defendants confidentially settled with the plaintiffs before trial, some claims were dismissed and other defendants won on summary judgment.

"You take a shotgun approach in these asbestos cases," said plaintiff's attorney Daniel Thomas, of Humphrey, Farrington & McClain inIndependence. "You narrow the claims as you go along and get additional information. "

The remaining defendants in the suit at trial wereBondex International, which produced joint compound used to seal joints between sheets in drywall, and ceiling tile producersConwed Corp. and Simpson Timber Co.

The plaintiffs made a $1.3 million demand ofBondex, and the company did not make an offer. However, Simpson Timber andConwed dispute the demands and offers given by Thomas. Thomas said plaintiffs demanded $2.5 million each from both parties, and Simpson Timber did not make an offer butConwed offered $90,000. Simpson Timber attorney, Nicholas , of Berkowitz Oliver Williams Shaw &Eisenbrandt inKansas City, said the demand was $1.5 million.Conwed's attorney, Clayton Dickey, of Rasmussen, Willis, Dickey & Moore inKansas City, said he could not discuss specific pretrial negotiations but that amount was not correct.

The defendants argued that their materials were not used in the buildings Wagner worked in, and that if their products were used they didn't contain asbestos. Both Simpson Timber andConwed madetiles that contained asbestos and tiles that didn't, Thomas said.

http://www.allbusiness.com/legal/trial-procedure-jury-trial/14473530-1.html

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Mesothelioma – Asbestos Legislation – Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Texas legislation would expediteMesothelioma lawsuits

June 20th, 2009 by Wendi Lewis

 

bill 100x100 Texas legislation would expedite mesothelioma
lawsuits

 

According to a report in Risk & Insurance magazine, legislation currently pending in the Texas Senate would make it easier for people withmesothelioma lawsuits to have their day in court. Senate Bill 1123, which is sponsored by Senator Robert Duncan (R-Lubbock) would eliminate the need for Mesothelioma victims to prove exactly how much asbestos they had been exposed to as the source of their cancer.

 

Mesothelioma is a rare but deadly cancer caused by asbestos exposure. It most often affects the lining of the lungs, but can also affect the lining of the abdomen or, more rarely, the heart.

 

A 2007 Texas Supreme Court ruling in an asbestosis case requires victims of asbestos disease to show exactly how much asbestos they were exposed to in order to prove causation. Asbestosis is a severe scarring of the lungs caused by exposure to asbestos. The standards in this ruling are currently also applied tomesothelioma lawsuits.

 

Sen. Duncan argues that the same standards of causation cannot be applied tomesothelioma cases, because of the usually long latency period of the disease. It can sometimes take decades from the point of asbestos exposure until the disease manifests with symptoms. As a result, it is often extremely difficult for plaintiffs to trace back to the source of their exposure and secure qualitative proof of the exact amount of exposure.

 

Senate Bill 1123 would use what is known as the “Lohrmann standard,” which requires amesothelioma plaintiff to “prove that exposure to asbestos was frequent, regular and proximal.” The bill would not affect the standard for asbestosis cases.

Some argue that the law will be too lenient, but Risk & Insurance quotes Sen. Duncan as saying the rule will only bringTexas in line with the standard used most widely throughout the rest of the country to determine causation inmesothelioma cases.

 

http://www.mesothelioma.law.pro/news/2009/06/20/texas-legislation-would-expedite-mesothelioma-lawsuits/
 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Mesothelioma– Asbestos Legal – Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Meso patient dies whileTexas court debates inconvenient forum

December 12th, 2008 by Wendi Lewis

While the Texas Supreme Court reviewed an appeal by seven asbestos manufacturers in order to determine an appropriate forum for trial, plaintiff Austin Richardsdied ofmesothelioma. According to the report published by BusinessInsurance.com, the defendants – businesses based inTexas – said trying the case in their home state violatedTexas civil code, because Richards lived inMaine. They argued trying the case inTexas would be an “inconvenient forum” for them, as it would be difficult for them to travel toMaine to depose witnesses.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of theTexas companies by unanimous vote, overturning a lower court ruling that would have allowed the trial to take place in the state. Richards brought suit against 21 defendants after being diagnosed withmesothelioma in 2005. All defendants manufactured or sold asbestos materials, according to the news report. Three of the defendants are based inTexas.

Richards worked as a mason, and regularly handled pipe insulation made with asbestos as part of his job.

The case was initially brought before aTexas state court inDallas. At that point, seven of the defendants asked that the trial be moved toMaine, citing theTexas code of “inconvenient forum.” Richards and his attorneys objected to the move, as they feared it would result in the case ultimately being assigned to the U.S. District Court inPhiladelphia as part of a multidistrictasbestos litigation. Mr. Richards feared he would not live long enough to see a trial in that case.

Unfortunately, Mr. Richards passed away before the case made it to oral deliberations before the Texas Supreme Court in September.

The three defendants that appealed theTexas state court decision to try the case inTexas were GE, Ingersoll and Warren Pumps. The Supreme Court decision can be found inIn Re General Electric Co. et al. The case will be moved toMaine.

 

http://www.mesothelioma.law.pro/news/2008/12/12/meso-patient-dies-while-texas-court-debates-inconvenient-forum/

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Mesothelioma – Asbestos Trades – $7.5 Million Mesothelioma Lawsuit

$7.5 Million Awarded in Asbestos Lawsuit Settlement

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

A former marine machinist, Robert "Bobby" Hilt ofVallejo,California, won $7.5 million in a mesothelioma lawsuit, which is one of the highest settlements for a patient as old as the 64-year-old Hilt inCalifornia courts' history.

Bobby Hilt was diagnosed with mesothelioma earlier in 2008, nearly a year from his trial.

Mesothelioma is an almost always fatal cancer of the tissues lining the lungs. Currently there is no effective treatment for the disease, which is almost always caused by exposure to asbestos. In most cases, mesothelioma does not develop until decades after exposure. Scientists are not sure why this is, but they do agree that asbestos exposure does lead to the cancer. Patients typically only survive for 12 to 18 months after their diagnosis of mesothelioma.

Hilt sued 11 defendants for causing his exposure to asbestos during his work as a machinist in the 1960s through the 1970s. He claimed that the defendants either made, supplied, or distributed the asbestos-containing materials around which he worked during his career.

Hilt's career involved a stint at the Bayshore plant for Schlage Lock Company from 1963 to 1965. After that time, he moved to work at the Hunter's Point Naval Shipyard until 1972. During the early part of the 1970s, Hilt worked as a machinist in the nuclear reactor compartments of the Sturgeon submarines at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard. It was during this decade of working at these places that Hilt feels he inhaled asbestos fibers that led to his mesothelioma. Since after his time at the shipyards, he went to work at the U.S. Mint inSan Francisco from 1972 until he retired in 2004.

The trial began early in November 2008, but two weeks into the proceedings, there were no longer any defendants still in court as the last of the eleven had chosen to settle out of court. Hilt and his wife declined to make a statement on the settlement.

http://www.asbestos.net/news/75-million-awarded-in-asbestos-lawsuit-settlement.html

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Compensatory Damages – Asbestos Legal–Mesothelioma Second Hand Exposure Lawsuit

Ohio nurse contracts Mesothelioma through second-hand exposure, suit claims 

9/19/2008 6:27 AM By KellyHolleran

 

AnOhio woman recentlydiagnosed with Mesothelioma filed an asbestos suit against 13 defendant corporations claiming the disease was wrongfully caused.

Kathy Castle claims she was diagnosed with the disease May 19, according to a lawsuit filed Sept. 15 in Madison County Circuit Court.

Castle says she worked from 1970 until 2008 as a nurse's aide, home nurse, secretary, clerical worker and clerk at various locations, according to the lawsuit.

She claims she contractedMesothelioma through second-hand exposure toasbestos fibers her family members would carry home on their clothes.

Kim Fleming, one family member, worked from 1977 until 1981 as a construction worker and mason assistant at various locations, according to the complaint.

Another family member, Donald Young, worked from 1972 until 1977 as plastic manufacturing
plant worker at various locations, the suit states. 

Castle states her exposure was foreseeable and should have been anticipated by the defendants, according to the lawsuit.

She claims her disease was caused after she was exposed to and inhaled, ingested or otherwise absorbed asbestos fibers. 

Castle alleges theasbestos-related disease has disabled and disfigured her and has and will continue to compel her to expend and become liable for large sums of money for hospital, medical, and other health and services necessary for the treatment of the disease. Castle also has and will continue to experience great physical pain and mental anguish as a result of the disease, he claims in the lawsuit.

Mesothelioma hindered and prevented Castle from pursuing his normal course of employment, according to the suit. 

As a result, she lost large sums of money, she claims.

In the two-count lawsuit, Castle seeks sums in excess of$50,000 and compensatory damages in excess of $50,000.

She also seeks punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish the defendants for their misconduct and to deter similarly situated parties from committing like acts of misconduct in the future.

She is represented by Robert Phillips and Perry J. Browder ofSimmonscooper LLC inEast Alton.

http://www.madisonrecord.com/news/214884-ohio-nurse-contracts-mesothelioma-through-second-hand-exposure-suit-claims

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Texas – Asbestos Legal - $11 Million Mesothelioma Verdict

Texas Mesothelioma Asbestos Lawsuit Results in $11M Verdict

AboutLawsuits.com | April 2nd, 2010 at 9:31 am

A Texas painter has been awarded $11 million in amesothelioma asbestos lawsuit against Bondex, Union Carbide and other manufacturers whose parts allegedly contained cancer-causing asbestos. 

A jury in Dallas handed down the verdict on March 30 in favor of Vernon Walker and his wife, Patsy Walker. According to a press release issued by attorneys representing the couple, Walker was diagnosedwith mesothelioma cancer after working as a career painter in the construction industry.

Walker worked as a union painter onskyscrapers and other construction projects. The defendants in theasbestos exposure lawsuit said that the types of asbestos Walker had been exposed to, including chrysotile and calidria, do not cause asbestos-related cancer.

The $11 million verdict apportioned 40% of the liability for Walker’s cancer to Union Carbide, and the rest of the blame was divided among defendants that included product manufacturers Bondex, Kelly Moore and Georgia Pacific. However, all of the defendants except Bondex settled out of court before a verdict was reached.

Mesothelioma is a rare and fatal form of cancer that is found in the lining of the chest and lungs. The only known cause of mesothelioma is asbestos exposure, and it is often not diagnosed until decades after exposure. As a result of the long latency period, the cancer is very advanced when it is diagnosed and life expectancy with the disease is limited.

Asbestos was widely used in a variety of manufacturing and construction applications throughout the last century, with use peaking in 1973. Most uses of asbestos were banned in the mid-1980s. Despite the ban, the U.S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that the number of mesothelioma deaths continues to rise each year due to the latency period, with the number expected to peak in 2010.

Asbestos mesothelioma lawsuits are the longest running mass tort in U.S. history, with the first asbestos exposure case filed in 1929. Over 600,000 people have filed lawsuits against 6,000 defendants after being diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis or other asbestos-related diseases.

http://www.ethiopianreview.com/news/52088

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 
Mesothelioma Lawsuit – Second-Hand Exposure from Father’s Work Clothes

Tennessee Supreme Court rules employer owes duty of care to employee's daughter

By Anonymous
Publication: LawyersUSA
Date: Monday, September 22 2008

An employer owes a duty to those who regularly come into close contact with the asbestos-contaminated clothes of their employees, theTennessee Supreme Court has ruled. A 25-year-old woman who contractedmesothelioma filed a negligence suit against Alcoa, alleging that it negligently permitted her father - who was an employee - to wear hisasbestos-contaminated clothes home from work, thereby regularly and repeatedly exposing her to asbestos fibers over an extended period of time.

Alcoa allegedly was aware of the presence of significant quantities of asbestos fibers on its employees' work clothes. It was also aware of the dangers posed by even small quantities of asbestos and that asbestos fibers were being transmitted by its employees. But the company nevertheless allegedly failed to take any measures to protect its employees or others they came in contact with.

The daughter was born prematurely and had to stay in the hospital for three months. Her father visited every day, wearing his asbestos-contaminated work clothes, so from the day of her birth she wasexposed to the asbestos fibers on herfather's work clothes.

Publication: LawyersUSA

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 

 Texas - Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Texas Mesothelioma Asbestos Lawsuit Results in $11M Verdict

AboutLawsuits.com | April 2nd, 2010 at 9:31 am

ATexas painter has been awarded $11 million in amesothelioma asbestos lawsuit againstBondex, Union Carbide and other manufacturers whose parts allegedly contained cancer-causing asbestos. 

A jury inDallas handed down the verdict on March 30 in favor of Vernon Walker and his wife, Patsy Walker. According to a press release issued by attorneys representing the couple,Walker was diagnosedwithmesothelioma cancer after working as a career painter in the construction industry.

Walker worked as a union painter on skyscrapers and other construction projects. The defendants in theasbestos exposure lawsuit said that the types of asbestosWalker had been exposed to, includingchrysotile andcalidria, do not cause asbestos-related cancer.

The $11 million verdict apportioned 40% of the liability forWalker’s cancer to Union Carbide, and the rest of the blame was divided among defendants that included product manufacturersBondex, Kelly Moore and Georgia Pacific. However, all of the defendants exceptBondex settled out of court before a verdictwas reached.

Mesothelioma is a rare and fatal form of cancer that is found in the lining of the chest and lungs. The only known cause ofmesothelioma is asbestos exposure, and it is often not diagnosed until decades after exposure. As a result of the long latency period, the cancer is very advanced when it is diagnosed and life expectancy with the disease is limited.

Asbestos was widely used in a variety of manufacturing and construction applications throughout the last century, with use peaking in 1973. Most uses of asbestos were banned in the mid-1980s. Despite the ban, the U.S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that the number ofmesothelioma deaths continues to rise each year due to the latency period, with the number expected to peak in 2010.

Asbestosmesothelioma lawsuits are the longest running mass tort inU.S. history, with the first asbestos exposure case filed in 1929. Over 600,000 people have filed lawsuits against 6,000 defendants after being diagnosed withmesothelioma, asbestosis or other asbestos-related diseases.

http://www.ethiopianreview.com/news/52088

 
Share this: facebook twitter linkedin reddit stumble delicious mixx digg yahoo
 
 

Asbestos Claimants
Asbestos Claims
Asbestos Class Action
Asbestos Compensation
Asbestos Compensation Fund
Asbestos Compensatory Damages
Asbestos Damages
Asbestos Economic Damages
Asbestos Employer Liability
Asbestos Exemplary Damages
Asbestos Federal Employers Liability
Asbestos Injury Claims
Asbestos Insurance
Asbestos Jury Award
Asbestos Jury Verdict
Asbestos Lawsuits
Asbestos Liabilities
Asbestos Litigation
Asbestos Loss Of Consortium
Asbestos Loss Of Future Earnings
Asbestos Lost Wages
Asbestos Medical Costs
Asbestos Medical Expenses
Asbestos Monetary Compensation
Asbestos Non-Economic Damages
Asbestos Pain And Suffering
Asbestos Product Liability
Asbestos Punitive Damages
Asbestos Related Claims
Asbestos State Statute
Asbestos State Workers Compensation
Asbestos Trust Fund
Asbestos Victims Compensation Fund
Asbestos-Related Injury
Deprived of the Companionship
Disfigurement in the Past and Future
Loss of Earning Capacity
Loss of Husband's Care and Comfort
Loss of Husband's Support and Companionship
Loss of Parental Care
Loss of Spousal and Parental Services
Mesothelioma Settlement
Past and Future Damages
Physical Impairment in the Past and Future
Victims Compensation Fund
Victims of Mesothelioma
Workers Injured by Asbestos
Wrongful Death Claims

Alabama Mesothelioma Claims
Colorado Mesothelioma Claims
Florida Mesothelioma Claims
Georgia Mesothelioma Claims
Illinois Mesothelioma Claims
Indiana Mesothelioma Claims
Kansas Mesothelioma Claims
Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Claims
Massachusetts Mesothelioma Claims
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Claims
Minnesota Mesothelioma Claims
Missouri Mesothelioma Claims
Montana Mesothelioma Claims
Nevada Mesothelioma Claims
North Carolina Mesothelioma Claims
Ohio Mesothelioma Claims
Texas Mesothelioma Claims
Utah Mesothelioma Claims
Washington Mesothelioma Claims
Wisconsin Mesothelioma Claims
 
 
 
 
 
35 Related Videos
 
Pleural Mesothelioma: a foreseable and avoidable death
10:01

Pleural Mesothelioma: a foreseable and avoidabledeath

Epidemiologic observations on an anatomical-pathologic and clinic case study from 1997 to 2006 - Service of Preventive Medicine (Head: Dr. Gerardo...

 
 
My Wife Was Murdered
8:45

My Wife Was Murdered

Wife died of Mesothelioma

 
 
Spodden Valley, asbestos scandal (part 1)
9:55

Spodden Valley, asbestos scandal (part 1)

Rochdale,North westEngland 1982. A scandalous company cover up in a site that processed Canadian chrysotile asbestos from the 1870s thru to the...

 
Canada blocks asbestos banAdded to
4:54

Canada blocksasbestos ban

More at therealnews.com UN Rotterdam treaty on toxic trade restrictions marred byCanada's stance onasbestos

 
Asbestos in building construction 1959
2:26

Asbestos in building construction 1959

This was clipped from the 1959 film,Asbestos a matter of time, by the US Bureau of Mines, Department of the Interior.

 
 
 
 
MP: "Fireproof Cotton Rock" - Asbestos in China Found by Marco PoloAdded to
2:22

MP: "Fireproof Cotton Rock" -Asbestos in China Found by Marco Polo

MARCO POLO: THECHINA MYSTERY REVEALED Did Marco Polo Really Discover Asbestos?

 
 
 
 
 
1965 Armstong asbestos tile commercial
1:16

1965 Armstongasbestos tile commercial

n 1860, Thomas M. Armstrong, the son of Scotish-Irish immigrants from Londonderry, joined with John D. Glass to open a one-room shop in Pittsburgh...

 
 
Asbestos in electrical work 1959
0:58

Asbestos in electrical work 1959

This was clipped from the 1959 film, Asbestos a matter of time, by the US Bureau of Mines, Department of the Interior. For more information about...

 
Asbestos The Silent Killer Part 1 of 3
8:45

Asbestos The Silent Killer Part 1 of 3

Produced by United Steelworkers Local 480 at the Teck Cominco Smelter in Trail, BC, this hard-hitting documentary examines the devastating human...

 
 
Asbestos Tragedy Libby Montana 2004 USEPA
2:36

Asbestos Tragedy Libby Montana 2004 USEPA

Processed vermiculite from the WR Grace Libby MT Mine contained tremolite, a form of asbestos, that was allowed to contaminate local

 
 
Summerlin Rd, Asbestos found, Fox News.wmv
2:10

Summerlin Rd,Asbestos found, FoxNews.wmv

Summerlin Rdasbestos found. Reported by FoxNews..

 
 
 
 
 
 
Video: Old Promotional Film For AsbestosAdded to
Quicklist
3:45

Video: Old Promotional Film ForAsbestos

www.searchmesothelioma.net Both the government and corporate industry used promotional newsreel type films during the 1950s and 1960s to promote...

 
Introduction to Asbestos from 1959Added to
Quicklist
2:30

Introduction toAsbestos from 1959

This clip is from the 1959 film, "Asbestos: a Matter of Time," by the Bureau of Mines (US Department of the Interior.) The entire film is..

 
 
 
 


4:38

About theAsbestos DiseaseAwareness Organization (ADAO)
Asbestos DiseaseAwareness Organization, ADAO, Linda Reinstein, BanAsbestos, www.adao.us

 

8:31
mesothelioma
Mesothelioma is an incurableasbestos cancer. This short film was produced to raiseawareness of the issues around mesothelioma. It...

 

 
 
 
      Home | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy      

Disclaimer:
Please Contact a physician with regard to health concerns.
The materials contained on this AsbestosNewsdaily.com are for informational purposes only and do not constitute health or medical advice. Use of information on this site does not create or constitute any kind of agreement or contract between you and the owners or users of this site, the owners of the servers upon which it is housed, or anyone else who is in any way connected with this site.
Many links on Asbestosnewsdaily.com lead to other sites. AsbestosNewdaily.com does not sponsor, endorse or otherwise approve of the materials appearing in such sites. Nor is Asbestosnewsdaily.com responsible for dead or misdirected links.
IF YOU NEED A LINK OR TEXT REMOVED FROM THIS PAGE PLEASE CONTACT removenews@asbestosnewsdaily.com. We will do our best to accommodate your request.

    Copyright 2009 - 2017
All Rights Reserved. AsbestosNewsDaily.com
   
      Mesothelioma Lawyer