Austin Texas Mesothelioma: Legal News
WE CONNECT YOU WITH EXPERIENCED AUSTIN TEXAS MESOTHELIOMA LAWYERS.
Finding the right Austin Texas Mesothelioma Lawyer to handle your case can be a very difficult and a time consuming task.Lawyers are very busy and may not be available to talk to you in your time of greatest need. We are here to assist you in finding an experienced Austin Texas Mesothelioma Lawyer to help you with yourlegal situation.
Asbestos News Daily`sFREE Lawyer Placement Service will connect you with experienced Austin Texas Mesothelioma Lawyer.
Having experienced legal representation can save you a lot of time and hard earned money.
We believe that people have the right to find the best possible legal representation from the most experienced lawyers.
We have developed relationships with the experienced Austin Texas Mesothelioma Lawyers that we know will work hard to win your case.
We cannot help solve everyone's legal situation, but we can help you to know your legal options and know that we are here to help you through the process of getting the legal help that you need.
Tell us about your case and a legal placement specialist will contact you within 24-48 hours.
POST YOUR CASE. GET RESULTS!
Austin Texas – Asbestos Legal - Asbestos Lawsuit
Breaking News:Texas Senate passes asbestos causation bill
4/16/2009 6:32 PM By MarilynTennissen
AUSTIN -- A bill that critics fear will expose thousands of additional businesses toasbestos lawsuits has passed the Texas Senate.
Senate Bill 1123, authored by state Sen. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock, relates to the standards ofcausation inmesothelioma claims.
The Senate approved SB 1123 on the evening of April 16 in a 20-11 vote, despite unified opposition from the business and legal reform community. The House version (HB 1811 by state Sen. CraigEiland, D-Texas City)is pending in the House Committee on the Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence.
The Senate bill will change established standards regarding the amount of a plaintiff's asbestos exposure and requirement that the plaintiff prove that the dose was sufficient enough to be a substantial factor in causingmesothelioma.
Support for the bills is coming from trial lawyers and labor unions, whose clients and members are usually lawsuit plaintiffs claiming asbestosexposure in the workplace.
In opposition are tort reform groups and a broad spectrum of the state's businesses and industries, which usually find themselves named as defendants in asbestos litigation.
"The personal injury lawyers' motive to expand asbestos litigation is simple: Now that reforms have clamped down on junk science asbestos lawsuits, personal injury lawyers are looking to expand the pot of money up for grabs by suing anyone, even if they're not at a fault," Chip Hough, chairman of the Bay Area Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, wrote in a recent column in the Southeast Texas Record.
According to a statement from Texans for Lawsuit Reform, "In effect, SB 1123 and HB 1811 reverse established law on the burden of proof, which does and should lie with the plaintiff.
"The new statute, instead, will place the burden of proof on a defendant to prove that a limited exposure to asbestos attributable to the defendant did not cause the plaintiff'smesothelioma."
Critics say SB 1123 will undo the 2007Texas Supreme Court decision,Borg-Warner Corp. v. Flores, which required plaintiffs to not only prove exposure to the defendant's product but also prove that the dose was sufficient to be a substantial factor in causingmesothelioma.
"Since so little evidence would be necessary under SB 1123, businesses would be forced to settle regardless of liability because they can't afford the cost of a lawsuit and the threat of unlimited damages," Hough wrote.