ASBESTOS NEWS DAILY - U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure
Asbestos Legal: U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure
We connect you with experienced U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure Mesothelioma Asbestos lawyers. If have been diagnosed with Mesothelioma or an Asbestos related illness we can help you file a claim.
U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure diagnosed with Mesothelioma and other Asbestos related diseases have legal options and may seek compensation through Mesothelioma litigation.
Filing a claim against the companies that are responsible for your asbestos exposure will help you gain compensation for medical costs and pain and suffering associated with asbestos-related illnesses. A Mesothelioma lawyer can help you pursue compensation for the following things:
- Lost income
- Medical bills
- Group support for yourself and loved ones
- End-of-life expenses
We help patients and their families make educated, informed decisions about how to proceed with filing Mesothelioma, Asbestosis and other asbestos-related cancer claims.
We will walk you through the entire process of connecting with an experienced U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure Mesothelioma Lawyer and also help you find a qualified Mesothelioma doctor.
U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure – Asbestos Trades - $10 Million Mesothelioma Verdict
Calif. appeals court: Blaming Navy for asbestos is OK
FRIDAY, JUNE 04, 2010 11:14:00 AM
BY JOHN O'BRIEN
SAN FRANCISCO (Legal Newsline) - Blame can be placed on theU.S. Navy for asbestos exposure, aCalifornia appeals court ruled Thursday.
The decision came after one of 17 entities that could have been ordered to pay a percentage of damages in an asbestos lawsuit appealed the exclusion of the Navy. Ulysses Collinsdied in 2005 of mesothelioma and U.S. Navy Asbestos Exposure from 1960-73 and 1976-94.
A jury allocated 20 percent of fault to Plant Insulation Company, which appealed to the state First District Court of Appeals. The overall verdict is worth $10 million.
"Plant argues theNavy's immunity is essentially one from suit and does not mean the service owes no duty of care as to its enlisted personnel and civilian employees and thus cannot be characterized as a 'tortfeasor' for purposes of Proposition 51," the decision says.
"Plaintiffs contend sovereign immunity is based on the historical adage 'the King can do no wrong' and therefore the Navy's actions cannot be 'wrongful' and thus no 'fault' can be allocated to the service.
"We agree with Plant and conclude theNavy is properly included among those entities to which fault may be apportioned in an asbestos case."
Attorney Mark Behrens of Shook Hardy & Bacon said having theNavy on the verdict form is "significant."
"My understanding is thatCollinswas an outlier and that mostCalifornia courts have listed theNavy on verdict sheets in asbestos cases," Behrens said.
"The appellate court's decision thus settles the practice and prevents other trial courts from going awry in the future."
Fifteen percent of blame was attributed to Fibreboard, 5 percent to Chevron/Standard Oil, 30 percent to Owens-Corning Fiberglas/FENCO/Kaylo, and 30 percent to Johns-Manville/Western Asbestos/Western MacArthur.
The court wrote the Navy is "immune from liability" in the case because of an exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act that bars actions based on the federal government's alleged negligence in using asbestos on ships.
From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.